One of the main features that Apple is touting in Photos is the iCloud Photo Library. While Apple believes that Photos will offer enough to satisfy many current Aperture users and pros, the company said it also understands that others might opt for a more powerful editing program like Adobe Lightroom. And you can’t add custom metadata fields in the app. For example, it doesn’t have brushable or curve adjustments and doesn’t support splitting and merging libraries. While Photos offers some advanced settings like white balance and level, it lacks some of the professional-level tools found in Aperture. For example, under Colors, you can fine-tune the saturation, contrast and cast. Not knowing a ton about photo editing, I also appreciated having the Auto button, which would automatically select the best settings based on the picture.įor those who have a little more photography know-how or want to experiment, you can drill down even further under these settings to make more refined adjustments. Compared to iPhoto, the tools offer better visuals to see what you’re doing. Under Adjust, you can tweak various aspects of the photo, including light, color and definition, using a simple slide ruler.
This will bring up a new side menu that offers editing tools like Enhance, Rotate, Crop, Filters, Adjust and Retouch. To edit a photo, you can simply click on the image and then press the Edit button in the upper right-hand corner. Photos offers many of the same editing tools as iPhoto, but they’re easier to use and offer more functionality. Overall, Photos is just a more visually stunning and pleasant app to use. You can also “favorite” photos and share them directly to a compatible third-party service like Tumblr by downloading a sharing extension from the Mac App Store. This includes shortcuts to your photos, shared images, albums and projects, which includes things like photo books, calendars and cards. Apple says that Photos devotes 67 percent more screen space to your images compared to iPhoto.Īlso, all the main tools are quickly accessible via the toolbar at the top of the screen, rather than being scattered throughout the app. Your pictures really take center stage in this app - I was able to see a lot more images at a glance, compared to iPhoto. Much like the iOS 8 app, photos in the desktop Photos app are organized based on when and where you took them, and grouped under the bigger umbrellas of Collections and Years. For me, there was barely a learning curve in jumping from iPhoto to Photos. With Photos for OS X, Apple has managed to build an app that feels both refreshingly new and comfortably familiar. But if you’re a developer, you can get a beta version of the new Photos desktop app starting today.īefore today’s beta release, Apple gave me the opportunity to have some brief hands-on time with the app - not nearly enough time to do a thorough review, but enough to gather these early impressions.
#Iphoto for mac latest version update
Today, the company provided an update on the status of the app, saying that it will release Photos for OS X this spring (the company declined to provide a more specific timeline), as part of a larger update to OS X Yosemite. The mobile version of Photos launched with iOS 8 in September, and the desktop app was promised for early 2015.ĭepending on your definition of “early 2015,” Apple is either on track or late to deliver on its promise.
#Iphoto for mac latest version professional
That’s why I perked up when Apple announced that it would retire iPhoto and its professional photo-editing software, Aperture, and replace them with a new and improved app called Photos. I’ve just been too lazy (and cheap) to look for alternatives. But in recent years, it has started to look and feel tired and outdated, with a cluttered interface, slow performance and limited features. I use it because it’s there and does mostly what I need it to do. For the past 13 years, iPhoto has been the standard photo management app on Apple’s Mac computers.
0 kommentar(er)
